Persistence of Monopoly, Innovation, and R&D Spillovers: Static versus Dynamic Analysis
نویسندگان
چکیده
We build a dynamic duopoly model that accounts for the empirical observation of monopoly persistence in the long run. More specifically, we analyze the conditions under which it is optimal for the market leader in an initially duopoly setup to undertake pre-emptive R&D investment, (“strategic predation” strategy) that eventually leads to exit of the follower firm. The follower is assumed to benefit from the innovative activities of the leader through R&D spillovers. The novel feature of our approach is that we introduce explicit dynamic model and contrast it with its static counterpart. Contrary to the predictions of the static model, strategic predation that leads to persistence of monopoly is in general optimal strategy to pursue in a dynamic framework when spillovers are not large.
منابع مشابه
Technological Leadership and Persistence of Monopoly under Endogenous Entry: Static versus Dynamic Analysis∗
We build a dynamic oligopoly model with endogenous entry in which a particular firm (leader) invests in an innovation process, facing the subsequent entry of other firms (followers). We identify conditions that make it optimal for the leader in the initial oligopoly situation to undertake pre-emptive R&D investment (strategic predation) eventually resulting in the elimination of all followers. ...
متن کاملProcess and Product R&D by a Multiproduct Monopolist: A Reply to Lin
With reference to Lambertini (2003), Lin (2004) correctly points out that, if R&D efforts for process innovation are endogenous, then process and product R&D are strategic complements. Then, he also proves that the opposite holds when spillovers are nil. Objecting to Lin’s second claim, I show that monopoly profits are everywhere increasing in the extent of information sharing within the firm. ...
متن کاملEndogenous Efficiency Gains from Mergers with and without Product Differentiation*
This paper analyzes endogenous efficiency gains from mergers. It considers oligopolistic homogeneous good markets and duopolistic and triopolistic markets under product differentiation (quantity and price competition). In a two-stage game, firms invest in cost-reducing innovation (with and without mergers) and then compete in output/prices. It is found that in homogeneous good markets, all poss...
متن کاملUncertainty , Spillovers , and Cooperative R & D
This paper extends the line of research on cooperation in R&D in an oligopoly with spillovers. Departing from the existing literature, we adopt an infinite-horizon dynamic framework, incorporate uncertainty, and define technology spillover as diffusion of a new technology from an innovator to non-innovators. We consider two cooperative regimes: the R&D cartel in which firms coordinates R&D effo...
متن کاملInnovations and Tournaments in an Endogenous Growth Framework
In the context of a patent race, if innovation is sequential and there is no cross licensing, patents offer the patent owner monopoly control over his innovation, al lowing him to block all relative future R&D. Against this background, this thesis shows that patent protection can foster innovation because it offers the innovator an incentive to innovate. However, the monopoly that the patent h...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006